Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

classicrock40 t1_iwmp8t4 wrote

Reply to comment by RenoSinNombre in Why 95 exit changes? by MadLove1348

required since 2009 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exit_numbers_in_the_United_States

MA is finally (mostly? all?) done and there was much complaining.

9

PhishPhanKara t1_iwmv0lw wrote

And I think RI is last? Or close to last because, of course we are 🤣

5

kdex86 t1_iwo2dja wrote

Nope. New Hampshire and Delaware still are 100% sequential exits. Vermont also “cut corners”, adding small “milepoint exit xx” signs on their highways but predominantly displaying the sequential numbers.

3

nick-j- t1_iwol0e8 wrote

Connecticut dosent yet either, well at least their main highways besides 395.

2

kdex86 t1_iwq61tz wrote

CT and NY are dragging their feet. Each state has converted at least 1 Interstate highway to mile-based exits, but most other highways are still sequential.

1

PhishPhanKara t1_iwo2ob7 wrote

Interesting, thank you for that info! I would have expected us to be dead last for sure!

1

monkysandtools t1_iwsafv4 wrote

CT did it half assed on their resignage (a friend is constantly on RT9 and mentioned the conflicting numbering)

As for VT, it seems rather silly along I-89 and I-91 (which are ~130 miles each) when's there only 20 something exits along each highway

0

sporkemon t1_iwmwqg6 wrote

hey, the example of the old sequential style with mile tabs on top is 295! we're relevant!

1

kdex86 t1_iwo27sg wrote

Massachusetts completed all of their exit renumbering in 10 months, from October 2020 to August 2021. Rhode Island, meanwhile, started in 2017 with I-295 and finally completed every highway when they finished I-95 earlier this month.

1