Submitted by cofonseca t3_ye6nww in RhodeIsland
Status_Silver_5114 t1_itz0drb wrote
Reply to comment by 8pointstar in President in town? by cofonseca
That a functioning non-grifting not beholden to Russia administration is in place? That problem? If you want the government to spend no money, go live in the mountains with no hookups to utilities to, don’t check the weather (national weather system), don’t drive on the highway (national highway system) or take social security when you retire.
8pointstar t1_iu0re8n wrote
Obviously US taxpayers should see a return on their tax investment. So no idea what inspired that little rant. To the point, Biden is a semi functional, piss poor president. He was a terrible senator as well. Astonishingly bad in fact. Corrupt, tone deaf, and ego driven. He was and remains a war criminal, as but one item on his long list of sins. Trump's sins, and they are legion, do not relieve Biden of his.
Status_Silver_5114 t1_iu0s1os wrote
That’s some tin foil hat speak you got there. But ok. Not sure what kind of visible things you would see from the feds …. A generic I need a return on my investments is gobbledegook libertarianism
8pointstar t1_iu2nvda wrote
This is a simple exchange so not sure why you can't follow. Why are you ranting about cabins in the wood? Did I say the government shouldn't spend money? No I did not. Again, if the people pay taxes, naturally they should expect those taxes to fund services. This assertiom is neither gobbledygook, nor tin foil hat speak, nor even debatable.
Status_Silver_5114 t1_iu3sfhd wrote
Oh I follow. Bitching because money was spent on a codel to Cranston as some symbol of government excess speaks volumes.
8pointstar t1_iu4yk1d wrote
What? lol I said no such thing. Meanwhile you are defending war criminals. Disgusting.
Status_Silver_5114 t1_iu4yu8k wrote
That makes no actual sense but you be you.
8pointstar t1_iu6cc6c wrote
As I said, you're apparently incapable of following a simple dialogue. Try this: war crimes = bad
Status_Silver_5114 t1_iu6e282 wrote
Apparently you think accusing Biden of war crimes is based in fact and not RW Putin friendly talking points?
8pointstar t1_iu6hedn wrote
Explain to me what Putin has to do with the Iraq WMD lie? Bottom line is you, and so many other bootlickers, will cheerfully go to bat for a disgusting, corrupt old man simply because he is not Trump. Horrifying logic. Utterly immoral. This is "if Putin says water is wet, then water is not wet" level thinking. But you do you.
Status_Silver_5114 t1_iu6hy6h wrote
You had to respond for the Umpteenth time before you made yourself clear re what you meant. I’m not even going to go there. Bc it’s both sideism and distracting from the actual issue at hand.
8pointstar t1_iu6jv1s wrote
The issue at hand is BIDEN. Not Trump. Thanks for coming around to it
Status_Silver_5114 t1_iu6kx6u wrote
And wmd? Give me a fucking break. If you want the last word, have it. Just reminds me how many crack pots live in the 401.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments