Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Blubomberikam t1_jasfaf7 wrote

That seems an awful lot like a list from a group you're copying from. Do you have links to the actual studies or just a list of someone's interpretations?

1

NewEngland313 t1_jasfm2e wrote

Do you want links to the actual source now?

1

Blubomberikam t1_jasg168 wrote

Always want a link to the actual study. A copy paste from what I'm sure is a biased advocacy group is useless.

1

NewEngland313 t1_jasgdtx wrote

Just saying I provided research examples, you could always type it in yourself. But okay ๐Ÿ‘Œ๐Ÿผ

1

Blubomberikam t1_jasi5tb wrote

I'm not the one making the claim so I have no responsibility to verify it. You have the burden of proof. You have provided someone else's analysis copied from a site with no links to the source data.

In this thread you have already said there was no confirmed genetic % and then immediately linked an 80% figure (also without a source) so you have not swayed me in any way nor given me any reason to trust what your saying.

1

NewEngland313 t1_jasihko wrote

Iโ€™m sorry that you feel that way, just trying to help the community in making healthy choices.

1

Blubomberikam t1_jasjfp6 wrote

Nothing I've said disagrees with that, I just care that I'm not trying to make things happen based on bad information.

You do understand why a stranger linking unsourced information on the internet is not reliable, right?

2