Submitted by beerisgreatPA t3_11zmr8o in RhodeIsland

This would effectively kill several businesses and make it very hard for RI breweries to grow and compete with CT and MA breweries. Several breweries already have these licenses and are relying on them to grow and support thier businesses.

What can you do to help? If you care about local breweries write your house and senate reps.

senate bill

house bill: house bill

​

Spread the word!

51

Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

newtoRI22 t1_jdd0en9 wrote

Any more background on why they are proposing this? Seems like catering to special interests, but I’d be curious to know more about why this is being introduced. (Who really cares who has a wholesalers license?)

20

Diligent-Pizza8128 t1_jddhns2 wrote

I noticed the second bill says “whose principal place of manufacture is outside of this state.” Any idea what the significance of that is?

Also curious to hear if any breweries or the RI Brewers Guild has a take on this.

4

geffe71 t1_jddruvs wrote

Teamster and McLaughlin & Moran are a pain in the dick. I can’t get my buddies beer in RI because of their bullshit

Stick to distributing hop flavored water and leave the little guy to do what they want

I’m union, but the teamsters seems to always pick fights that make no sense and don’t fight for shit that need to change

23

brickwars19 t1_jddwsl9 wrote

Distributors are awful the 3 tier system needs to change, I'm sure at one time it was a necessity but no more

9

Distinct-Ad5751 t1_jde35fe wrote

I’m terrible at writing letters on issues, do you have a template we can use?

1

Proof-Variation7005 t1_jde5tzz wrote

If the restriction was on out of state, I'd think that would be a decent compromise. Brewers in Rhode Island don't like it because if you're someone like Whalers and you built a pretty solid brand here, this impacts your ability to pick up your operation and move it out of state.

And, make no mistake about it, that's the only thing they're looking out for with opposition to that version.

3

NichS144 t1_jdenzgu wrote

Unions are great in theory, but many have become nothing but political tools that are against the individuals that they are suppose to protect, the teamsters being among the worst of them.

−4

relearningnormal t1_jdev0gy wrote

No, technically breweries in the state are not allowed to actually self distribute. Right now they use a loophole, which is some people who own one business that is a brewery and then open a different company that is a distributor. They get trucks, sell their own stuff at various stores and often use the same employees who are part time at both places (not union, so little benefits).

They’re still able to sell on the brewery site but they are not legally supposed to distribute in RI, they’re supposed to hire other companies and yeah the teamsters want it to be them.

Not saying I agree or not with this but the title is misleading as that’s not what the bill is. Whether the original law is right or not, 🤷‍♀️. State is just trying to address the loophole they have. Not sure what they guys name was but he testified recently at a hearing about it as he has a brewery and then a different Llc distribution company.

1

Jmac3366 t1_jdexe80 wrote

If I’m understanding correctly they want breweries to be unable to distribute so they have to use teamster trucks?

2

Desperate_Expert_952 t1_jdfv1js wrote

You want to take on the teamsters? Look at the providence bus fires for recent history of how that goes

1

Familiar-Ending t1_jdfwqff wrote

Teamsters want the work for Union drivers. Distributors want a piece of every pie there is

−2

NichS144 t1_jdkcw12 wrote

Kinda shocked to see so much anti-union sentiment coming from a RI sub. Is it just the Teamster you don't like or unions in general? What do you see as the issue with unions? I thought they were a pretty standing progressive thing.

2