Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

degggendorf t1_j6tt4so wrote

Reply to comment by [deleted] in Man claims self-defense in Providence landlord homicide by Rogue-Island-Pirate

And you read this lease to be able to so definitively say he "had no legal right to be there"?

9

[deleted] t1_j6turzs wrote

I’m going to go out on a limb and say that if he wasn’t the leaseholder/tenant, and was inhabiting the unit after the tenant abandoned it (as the article suggests), the balance of evidence suggests he probably was squatting or trespassing.

Of course, there’s always the possibility that this is the rare exception, but it’s a rare exception for a reason.

−8

degggendorf t1_j6txfuk wrote

The language you use in this comment seems to more accurately convey speculation, as opposed to how you initially phrased it.

7

[deleted] t1_j6txjks wrote

I generally apply Occam’s Razor to most situations. It has rarely failed to deliver.

One of the more annoying responses to common sense observations is endless demands for citations… from folks who never cite anything themselves.

−5

degggendorf t1_j6u6zf9 wrote

Yeah it must be annoying not being able to just say whatever you want without regard for its accuracy

4

[deleted] t1_j6u7b7k wrote

Well gosh, it’s equally pleasing to have you there to parse my every word to impute meaning that wasn’t communicated! So I’m doubly lucky!

Such guardians of “accuracy” truly improve society 😁

−2

StreetStatistician t1_j6v3hfd wrote

>Occam’s Razor

The most simple and common scenario would be assuming he was just the guest of the tenet, not some bizarre scenario you've concocted.

2