Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_j53kd4d wrote

Reply to comment by gslavik in Ranked Choice Voting (aka instant runoff voting) in Pennsylvania by squirreltalk

Just to be clear I have no issue with people wanting to promote third party and independent candidates (in fact I believe it would be a good thing).

I’m just skeptical that RCV would ever yield these results in reality. On paper it sounds promising but I don’t know how that would translate to the real world.

I feel like people would still effectively just vote for a Democrat or Republican by either only ranking one candidate or just continually ranking R’s and D’s number 1.

You bring up a decent point about ranking a plethora of candidates being a tedious process.

Maybe rank choice voting is the way to combat the stigma of voting third party but I feel like it’s a steep hill to overcome.

1

gslavik t1_j53mdgk wrote

You bring up a good point and that is definitely a concern. Only counter argument I have is that RCV doesn't make things worse.

In NYC, they let you rank 5 candidates. In Alaska, they have a primary that is essentially plurality and top 3 go into general where RCV determines the winner (it was 2 Republicans and 1 Democrat in the last election).

There are definitely ways to solve this that can be done on computerized ballots and on paper ballots. We can print a 20x20 grid of bubbles, I am sure. Alternatively, use a computer to create the list that is then printed, scanned and counted (so you have a paper ballot that can be manually verified and an electronic count for a much quicker result).

1

BufloSolja t1_j54zh6r wrote

RCV would allow ppl to pick 3rd party voters if they wanted to for first choice. As it is now, most ppl don't because they won't realistically win because they don't think enough other people will vote, and also as their vote will be 'wasted'.

With RCV essentially leading to more first rank votes to 3rd parties, they do increase the chance for victory, but mainly it will be a better way to see the opinions of the public imo.

1