Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

JohnDeere714 t1_j64wf21 wrote

What’s fucked up is that this is less than 15 minutes away from me and I’m now hearing about it. Maybe one story happened but it was barely touched

6

jillianpikora OP t1_j6518m8 wrote

The court clerk told me I was the second reporter to request the court documents, the other outlet was WJAC. I think that is so weird since the police announced the arrests. Maybe if the protest on Tuesday has a large turnout this will get more coverage.

3

No-Razzmatazz- t1_j652wjm wrote

Since you're the reporter why did you think that it was important to include the fact that the victim was a virgin, to the point of highlighting it in the headline?

4

DigitalHemlock t1_j66a2k6 wrote

Reporters don't get to pick their own headlines. Often the ones selected piss them off and they are written by editors to get people to read.

5

jillianpikora OP t1_j67lwyk wrote

Yep, that is exactly what happened, but I was slacked and a discussion was had. I ultimately felt it was/is an important detail (others thought her intoxication was important "Drunk Woman Raped"... I very much vetoed that). The woman assaulted emphasized this detail multiple times in her police interview to highlight why the attack was so horrific for her. It was clear her virginity was important/significant to her and it made the emotional and physical trauma of the rape and assault worse so she wanted authorities and later a court to beware of this. Based on that element of the court documents I did give the headline the final ok, especially since I had already mentioned her virginity in the body of the article.

4

JohnDeere714 t1_j657a99 wrote

Yeah even the fact that this happened a year ago. It did not show on on local news as much as it should. It’s a really fucked up situation

1