Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

FerDeLancer t1_j47ao1y wrote

Plain and simple dishonorable and negligent hunter who brought shame on the pastime. U have to be certain of your shot and everything in between and beyond your line of sight. This was irresponsible at best.

13

Uuuccc t1_j48t9ly wrote

I don’t hear this enough from hunters yet it’s one of the first things you learn in the training to get licensed.

6

Phantom_spook t1_j4awe6y wrote

How was he negligent? He made a good and safe shot. He shot a dog that he thought was a coyote. The dog wasn’t on a leash next to the owner and who knows what color or how thick the collar/harness it had on. Now if the dog had a blaze orange vest on the hunter would be in the wrong but that’s not what happened.

0

FerDeLancer t1_j4ckcqc wrote

It’s called identifying the target. Thats why its negligence. It was harnessed and collared. If you cant see that much you can’t see enough to take that shot

2