Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Muscadine76 t1_j6fgk5g wrote

Reply to comment by drxdrg08 in Universal Childcare for Pennsylvanians— and everyone in the US by Existing-Papaya-8643

The estimate this year of nonpayers for federal income tax is closer to 40% and 1/3 of those households are retired people who mostly live on Social Security. Most of the rest are households with low or no income, especially those raising children, or else that have things like short term major business losses or medical bills. It doesn’t particularly make sense for people to be paying income tax in those situations.

Also, most everyone is paying some form of taxes: sales, excise, property, payroll. Those taxes are generally regressive in that they’re a much greater burden for low to moderate income households. Federal taxes offsetting that somewhat is a good thing.

19

drxdrg08 t1_j6g7djn wrote

> The estimate this year of nonpayers for federal income tax is closer to 40%

The figure is over 50% any year if you factor in redistribution that happens after taxes. If you pay $3000 in federal taxes but receive $30,000 in Medicaid coverage, SNAP and housing assistance, then that doesn't mean you are a "taxpayer" in the context of paying for new government programs.

−4

Muscadine76 t1_j6gbkn8 wrote

The position that people who receive valuable taxpayer services aren’t taxpayers is incredibly disingenuous.

14

drxdrg08 t1_j6gtlsx wrote

It's not a position. It's a simple mathematical fact.

−5

Muscadine76 t1_j6i5bh9 wrote

Now you’re either doubling down on disingenuousness or just aren’t familiar with what a “fact” actually is. If I pay $100 a month for house insurance for a year and at the end of that year my house burns down and I’m given $250,000 to rebuild, that doesn’t mean I was never an “insurance payer”. If I donate $10 to my local food bank every few months, then lose my job for a year and get $100s of dollars in food support from the pantry, that doesn’t mean I’m not a donor.

5

drxdrg08 t1_j6ic2g6 wrote

> If I pay $100 a month for house insurance for a year and at the end of that year my house burns down and I’m given $250,000 to rebuild, that doesn’t mean I was never an “insurance payer”.

Your analogy does not make sense. Government means tested benefits are not one time payments.

If your house burns down every year, and you get $250,000 every year while you only pay $1200 every year into the insurance pool... that's an accurate analogy.

If you give $1 to the government in taxes, and the government gives you $10 right back, that doesn't mean you can be counted on as a source of taxes for the next redistribution program that the government comes up with. This isn't rocket science to understand. This is basic math.

But I highly suspect that it's not that you don't understand, you just want to ignore inconvenient facts. That's what Reddit does, come up with a false narrative and ignore basic facts.

−1

69FunnyNumberGuy420 t1_j6i7qvs wrote

"Half of all Americans are too poor to pay federal taxes" is not the glowing endorsement of our tax system that you think it is.

2