Submitted by Existing-Papaya-8643 t3_10odek9 in Pennsylvania
defusted t1_j6ej7ya wrote
Reply to comment by obsolete-man in Universal Childcare for Pennsylvanians— and everyone in the US by Existing-Papaya-8643
Well, you're an asshole. I have no kids but I'm still all for things like this and paying taxes for better schools because I don't want to be surrounded by morons like you. Making schools and daycare better is how you do that
cabinetsnotnow t1_j6fazgr wrote
To be frank, I already pay over $4,000 per year for school taxes and obviously that amount will always gradually increase over time. It's not reasonable to expect others to just keep forking out more and more of their income for parents and kids. People without kids who are struggling financially and go without food and housing usually have an impossible time getting help from the government already. While people with kids just keep getting more help. At what point does it end?
defusted t1_j6ffhpv wrote
Should a person without a car pay for roads?
KindKill267 t1_j6fnmgw wrote
If you're not registering a car or buying gas you're probably not.
defusted t1_j6fqg6g wrote
The taxes you pay to the state goes to building and maintaining roads. You're definitely paying for the roads.
KindKill267 t1_j6fu3ls wrote
Penndot is the road state agency, the bulk of their funding comes from gas taxes and federal funding.
cabinetsnotnow t1_j6kkewg wrote
I'm not saying that I shouldn't pay any school taxes. Educated kids become educated adults who go into society, so I get why paying for education is important.
What I'm saying is that I don't think I should be expected to keep paying for more and more expenses that should fall on parents who chose to have kids. If the problem is that daycares are overcharging parents for their services, then do something about that. Taxpayers picking up the tab should not be the default solution to everything.
obsolete-man t1_j6emn2n wrote
I'll give your opinion the full consideration that it's due. If someone wants society to be responsible for the day-to-day care of their child, they should just surrender it to the State. Daycare is not education: https://1851franchise.com/lightbridgeacademy/understanding-the-difference-between-daycare-and-educational-child-care-2703161#stories
WhiskeyandScars t1_j6enpid wrote
Lightbridge is a daycare.
WhiskeyandScars t1_j6eo5xk wrote
The link is to a page promoting a business. It is not any sort of actual educational resource or state/government definition of what a daycare is.
obsolete-man t1_j6eqr80 wrote
Exactly, my point. It's a daycare center telling you flat out that it's not the same as preschool.
WhiskeyandScars t1_j6eskx2 wrote
From the link "Lightbridge Academy explains why daycare and their educational child care program are simply not the same thing."
Lightbridge is claiming they are more than a daycare.
Licenced day care centers have educational requirements to meet. There are even some that offer more intensive programs and kindergarten.
Lightbridge is a daycare.
defusted t1_j6ew5gh wrote
Wow you really are a big dumb asshole. You do know that there are schools that are also businesses, right? All the way from daycare to college.
Look I picked the second website on Google and it contradicts your stupid comment. https://www.dhs.pa.gov/Services/Children/Pages/Child-Care-Early-Learning.aspx
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments