Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

ScienceWasLove t1_j3ij7el wrote

Yes.

10,920 votes from 1,000,000 is 1%.

3,503 from 187,000 is 1.8%.

0

MetaGoldenfist t1_j3ijnq0 wrote

Who cares about the percentage. The article doesn’t mention percentage but you keep mentioning it. That doesn’t change the actual fact that more Democrats had their mail in ballots discarded. It also doesn’t change the fact that the envelope and date law that the state Supreme Court upheld is straight up voter suppression.

2

ScienceWasLove t1_j3ik0mz wrote

More democrats did because more people voted democratic. Not because they were targeted.

If as many republicans voted, the numbers would be reverse.

Percentage of a whole is important because it allows you to make comparisons.

Make things proportional.

0

MetaGoldenfist t1_j3ikfb8 wrote

Your missing the important piece which is that more people voted democratic by mail so of course statistically more dems would have their mail in ballots be wrong but ALSO the Supreme Court upholding the stupid law making casting mail in ballots more complicated bc of the date/signature/envelope law is blatant voter suppression bc they know dems are more likely to vote by mail. Either way it didn’t work.

2

ScienceWasLove t1_j3j0edy wrote

Do you think I am missing those points, I am one of the few people who read the article.

1