TacoNomad t1_j0dgs31 wrote
Reply to comment by Inner-Figure5047 in Rubber Gloves, Condoms, Baby Oil Found On Lebanon Dad Of 5 Meeting 13-Year-Old From Florida At Wilkes-Barre Hotel: DHS by jillianpikora
And wasn't arrested?
NoWarrantShutUp t1_j0dnxq6 wrote
At that point they probably just had him saying that.. in order to really nail this guy they most likely needed much more, hence meeting him at the hotel. I know it’s not right but without enough evidence it’s just too big of a risk, instead they chose to wait and catch him red handed thus borderline guaranteeing putting this scumbag behind bars. Now if they had pictures along with it I would say that’s a different story.
James0nJuiceb0x t1_j0dq70x wrote
> At that point they probably just had him saying that..
They did. He disclosed it to the same undercover that was part of setting up the sting.
It was all part of the operation.
TapewormNinja t1_j0dhhvr wrote
“You won’t believe it, Chief! I was just hanging out in a bar, having a quiet drink, and this guy comes up and starts telling me about raping kids. He just spends his whole day raping away at ‘em!”
“So you arrested him right? The self confessed rapist?”
“Aww man, I knew I forgot to do something today.”
Crypto_Candle t1_j0dx28v wrote
They said it was a local cop, not the State Police.
-TheFarce- t1_j0dpqdv wrote
> Morey met the undercover officer on the social media app Wickr using the name DARKRAVEN329 and quickly began asking about his daughter, who does not really exist, an officer explains in the complaint. He then asked the officer if he had sex with his fictitious daughter, graphically described sexual acts he did with or in front of his own children, and what he wanted to do to the officer's daughter, as well as ask for photos of the fake child.
ohnomoto450 t1_j0e2e7l wrote
Fire up the wood chipper
CocoaMotive t1_j0e1dwe wrote
I hope he never sees the outside world again.
Unable-Bison-272 t1_j0du1hd wrote
Good god
mrboozer t1_j0djmmz wrote
It's in the article FFS.
TacoNomad t1_j0dk78f wrote
I mean, I thought he was talking about a different incident. No need to get all pissy.
Er3bus13 t1_j0dxim1 wrote
This is pa here yellow is in our flag.
delusions- t1_j0g9us0 wrote
> I thought he was talking about a different incident
You'd know he wasn't if you read the fucking article
TacoNomad t1_j0ganiw wrote
Sorry for not clicking every link I come across. Thanks for your opinion. It's really fucking important for you to repeat the other comments here. Certainly you read the fucking comments? And still felt the need to be a turd.
delusions- t1_j0gycbv wrote
Your ignorance is not my failing, it's yours.
TacoNomad t1_j0h223l wrote
Awwww. Poor thing. Feeling so good about this?
3 comments deep into the telling me to read the article. So clearly you know that Im already aware it's in the article. You just need to repeat it. Must make you feel really important.
I feel for you bro. You need something to feel good about. I'm OK with being the recipient of your anger.
delusions- t1_j0h9d5u wrote
Projecting much? Trying to talk down to me to feel bigger, with "Bro" and "poor thing"? Lol.
TacoNomad t1_j0hd300 wrote
Brothers are equal. I didn't call you son. Which would be a term of inferiority.
You came out aggressive at me telling me to read the fucking article. Because you were being super kind and helpful? It's not even like my original comment, to someone else, was negative either.
And when I pointed out that others had already suggested this and it was an unnecessary comment, you responded calling me ignorant.
Yet you don't see how you're being shitty.
Are those the behaviors of a kind person? I didn't come for you. You came for me, aggressively. I responded in kind. And you came back even more aggressive.
What else should I assume? You needed an ego boost behind your keyboard. And I accept that it'll make you feel better to keep acting in this foolish manner. Either look in the mirror and see how you fucking started it, or accept that I'm going to keep calling it like I see. Ego boost initiated!
Tr0gd0r17 t1_j0g0zd9 wrote
A person can’t be charged with a crime solely for admitting to it without any other substantiating evidence. The fancy Latin term for it is corpus delicti. For example bragging that you killed someone just to look dangerous and tough. I’ve been a defense attorney for years and never had someone brag about or admit to touching a kid outside of an interrogation for no reason so that probably makes this one pretty obvious. It will definitely cause them to investigate further and hopefully at that point they can really figure out what’s going on. I hope I’m wrong and this fucker was just saying crazy shit for no reason and never actually touched the kids. But given this situation it doesn’t look good. I really hope those little ones are ok. But if they look into it I’d bet the evidence is there.
TacoNomad t1_j0g8kzh wrote
It's still probable cause to detain and search, no? Isn't it 48 hours to charge someone once detained? Based on everything we know about pedophiles, and the circumstances of the arrest, it's unlikely that he was lying.
Iceman9161 t1_j0gbbcf wrote
Bragging to a “friend” is shaky evidence, even if the friend was an undercover cop. Confessions given in a much more official setting have been thrown out before. They knew he was a criminal, they just needed to keep an eye on him long enough to nail him
TacoNomad t1_j0gbpdw wrote
Yeah and they could detain him while looking for more evidence. Admitting to raping a child has got to be probable cause?
I just don't believe we live in a society that this doesn't warrant further attention.
Obviously in this case, it's part of the investigation. But generally speaking, I can't believe that this would be one of those "nothing we can do" scenarios. When cops are out here killing people for less. That's all. I'm cynical about law enforcement of sexual predators.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments