Submitted by TyeDyeAmish t3_ypdjip in Pennsylvania
timewellwasted5 t1_ivk8b30 wrote
Reply to comment by TacoNomad in Todays The Big Day Everybody!!! Get Out And Vote!! by TyeDyeAmish
Certainly, here are bills that he vetoed by year:
2022 - 10 bills
2021 - 5 bills
2020 - 19 bills
2019 - 4 bills
2018 - 5 bills
2017 - 3 bills
2016 - 8 bills
2015 - 10 bills if you include the line item veto, 9 if you don't
Total: 64 (65 if you count the line item veto)
That covers all his years in office and was easy to find with a quick Google search. Happy to help :)
TacoNomad t1_ivk9xw5 wrote
Thanks. That's helpful. I'm reviewing the vetoed bills, I should have asked more directly, which vetoed bills you find important that he vetoed.
Looking at some of these, well, some are really odd, unnecessary or clearly in bad faith, so I'm thankful we have a sane governor looking out for us. I'm curious if there are any in particular that you you believe were vetoed in bad faith
timewellwasted5 t1_ivkb00h wrote
Not at all. I actually like Tom Wolf. I don't always agree with him, but I believe he's a good dude and his intentions are genuine.
What I DON'T like is when people blindly say Republicans have some stranglehold on power and the direction of the state which very clearly isn't there. Anything passed over the last eight years in PA required the signoff of the Republican legislature and the Democratic governor. Saying anything else, such as what was suggested in the original comment I replied to, is wholly false.
TacoNomad t1_ivkbnv3 wrote
I agree with that. But one factor is, if there is a republican majority, lots of democrat led policy won't even make it to the governor. Who controls the legislature is definitely a factor in what laws are proposed. I like, at least, that Pennsylvania is a purple state and that there is potential for all voices to be heard. But having the majority control still does have impacts.
timewellwasted5 t1_ivkc4ia wrote
>if there is a republican majority, lots of democrat led policy won't even make it to the governor.
And if there is a Democratic governor, most Republican policy won't make it in to law. It's literally the system of checks and balances working exactly as intended. The odds of a 50/50 Democrat/Republican legislature split are astronomically low. Ergo, Republicans are not 'running the state' as originally suggested. Our system of checks and balances is in place and is working.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments