Submitted by Open_Veins_8 t3_ynfd69 in Pennsylvania
thenewtbaron t1_ivai1xt wrote
Reply to comment by ScienceWasLove in NAACP Seeks Legal Relief from PA GOP Voter Suppression by Open_Veins_8
You didn't ask me anything.
Well, you do know that new laws are allowed beyond the constitution, infact, it is how the Republicans made this a law.
But generally the federal government can't do certain things to citizens, and it requires that states follow the same rules. Such as freedom of speech and the like. There are a couple of things about voting that the state can't do... One of which is turn away votes because of none needed details that are immaterial to the voting.
Once again, if we are using the feet pics to vote, would you also be for that requirement for mail in voting?
ScienceWasLove t1_ivaw6mc wrote
I stand corrected. I was replying to the OP above which asked where in the constitution it says things must be dated.
It obviously doesn’t. Which is why he asked the rhetorical question.
It obviously doesn’t mandate mail in voting, which I why I also asked my rhetorical question.
The stupidness of his statement prompted the stupidness of my statement.
Obviously laws/policies and regulations dictate a whole variety of voting procedures from mail-in to in-person voting. All external to the constitution.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments