For those worried about the PA Supreme Court’s ruling on undated ballots, it may be of some relief to you that this year’s ballot envelope is VERY unambiguous. While I personally find the ruling utterly preposterous I’d also say that the ballot itself is competently designed to compensate for it.Submitted by Trapezoidoid t3_ykckns in Pennsylvania
IrrumaboMalum t1_iuv4stj wrote
Reply to comment by thenewtbaron in For those worried about the PA Supreme Court’s ruling on undated ballots, it may be of some relief to you that this year’s ballot envelope is VERY unambiguous. While I personally find the ruling utterly preposterous I’d also say that the ballot itself is competently designed to compensate for it. by Trapezoidoid
Nothing - except the legal requirement under Pennsylvania state law. That is the root of the problem, and that is what needs addressed.
thenewtbaron t1_iuv6rb5 wrote
Sure, and once again, there are other ways than forcing legislators from rewriting the law to change the laws, such as it being found invalid vs other laws, such as the courts.
The PA supreme court was pretty split on it, and the us supreme court allowed the ballots to be counted in june/july which led to the republican candidate losing, then they said the decision was moot. So they didn't actually make a decision on a thing in a wider context, just a very narrow context.
but hey, that's fine. stupid republican laws can exist.... and now they can't complain about it for this election.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments