The way this man can not turn down harming the environmentSubmitted by ActivatedFamiliar t3_ydl0mn in Pennsylvania
LordFarquaad_theG t1_itsufaa wrote
Reply to comment by Janderss182 in The way this man can not turn down harming the environment by ActivatedFamiliar
Nuclear is not bad. But we need to diversify, can't rely on one source of energy.
Janderss182 t1_itsukr1 wrote
Cool. Most green energy sucks, is expensive, and is not efficient.
LordFarquaad_theG t1_itsuwm4 wrote
Not true. Solar, wind, geothermal, hydro are good non-dispatchable sources we can use to diversify.
[deleted] t1_ittduhs wrote
[removed]
throwaway60992 t1_itt8cqn wrote
You clearly are not an engineer…
Janderss182 t1_itsv6k1 wrote
Not true. We don’t even have batteries that are capable of banking most the energy we get from many of those forms of power
LordFarquaad_theG t1_itsvek3 wrote
Hence why they are called non-dispatchable. You need to have both dispatchable and non-dispatchable for true energy independence.
Janderss182 t1_itsvn69 wrote
dispatchable isn’t even a word lol
LordFarquaad_theG t1_itsw3j1 wrote
kiddestructo t1_itszq27 wrote
kiddestructo t1_itt1z6i wrote
You said green energy sucks. I gave you an example. It’s pretty simple..
Janderss182 t1_itt04j9 wrote
Ok cool. Don’t know what this really has to do with anything
OligarchWelfare t1_ittigle wrote
Green energy is cheaper than any but keep lying because that's what Republicans told you to believe
Janderss182 t1_itunuyw wrote
Actually it’s not but keep lying because you’re an ideologue and can’t think outside of what your bullshit political parties tell you to think
Janderss182 t1_itunwci wrote
Far from a republican bud
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments