[removed]

Thanks for posting this. I clicked around to sample some Q&As, and am reassured. As an R voter for 40 years until you-know-who was nominated, it's still hard for me to check a D box...but I'm starting to get used to it.

> As he’s done in other interviews, Fetterman, the state’s lieutenant governor, has asked for closed-captioning accommodations to account for lingering auditory processing issues related to his ongoing recovery from a May 13 stroke.

The man literally cannot understand the words spoken to him.

Trump can't form a coherent sentence either?

> Trump can't form a coherent sentence either?

I didn't know he was running for Senate in PA.

Because he had a literal stroke. Disabled does not mean Unable.

Its his version of the Republican party being pushed forward, especially by men like Dr. Oz.

Even still; if you are s supporter of Donald Trump and you're going after Fetterman, you are the epitome of hypocrispy. Donald Trump has very rarely made a cogent statement, or cohesive thought without the backing and writing of dedicated staff as has been plainly shown in every single of one of his rants where he is able to speak freely.

One man requires some technology, and understands when his words are incorrect and is actively getting better. The other uses it as a style of speaking whilst also performing the most powerful position in the world, or did at least.

I'll admit that I was concerned about his recovery and fitness for office when I watched his first interview after the stroke.

20min into this interview, and I have no concerns at all about his health.

He understood and responded coherently to every question received, with a few stumbles here and there.

I don't care if you need a monitor.

I just care that you can comprehend, hear from constituents, and argue on behalf of the electorate.

Bonus points if you're not 70+ years old.

Why won't he be in a real debate?