Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_jccvbk5 wrote

Reply to comment by Alfa505 in Central York School District is back to banning books by melosebrain37

[deleted]

2

Alfa505 t1_jcdlsl2 wrote

You’re going to have to fill me in on my beliefs of child marriage. However if we’re going to make assumptions I can see how you think this book is appropriate sense you support pedophilia.

1

[deleted] t1_jcdr6ua wrote

[deleted]

1

Alfa505 t1_jcfbgeb wrote

Again that’s not a stance of the Republican party, just the blind opinion of a moron. I took the time to actually read this book and while I find it in part inspiring it is also incredibly graphic rape, incest and very sexually graphic (think rated R) as in the suggested age would be 17 or with parental consent. Now i can tell by the wisdom in your comments your parents started you on R rated movies at 6 months old but some people think developing minds should read age appropriate content. Sorry if that implodes your tiny liberal reddit hive mind.

0

[deleted] t1_jcfgsr4 wrote

[deleted]

3

Alfa505 t1_jcfvy43 wrote

That’s such a ridiculous statement you can’t be taken seriously.

0

[deleted] t1_jcfw9qw wrote

[deleted]

3

Alfa505 t1_jcg155l wrote

Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

0

[deleted] t1_jcg1g6i wrote

[deleted]

2

Alfa505 t1_jcg2l48 wrote

“As it stands, minors 16 and over may obtain a marriage license with parental consent, and children under the age of 16 must obtain an additional waiver from a judge. “

Did you even read these or just like the gaslighting headlines?

1

[deleted] t1_jcg3kjo wrote

[deleted]

2

Alfa505 t1_jcg5pge wrote

Lol just because you keep calling people pedophiles does not make them that. I would need to see some case study where this is common place or even happening at all.

0