Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

iluvgivingblowjobs t1_jamme9t wrote

Reply to comment by Lance_lake in In pre-Roe hearings, Pa. women described their anguished, resolved search for an abortion by FrederickChase

So you agree that murder is sometimes acceptable? Interesting.

13

Lance_lake t1_jamogvb wrote

> So you agree that murder is sometimes acceptable? Interesting.

Yes. I presume you agree that if someone is going to kill you, it's ok to kill them. I also presume you accept killing in terms of warfare where it's the purpose of war.

If you need to save a life, then killing the being putting that life in danger is acceptable IMHO.

−21

iluvgivingblowjobs t1_jamv2ki wrote

Glad we agree that safe abortion should continue to be available.

14

Lance_lake t1_janb6w0 wrote

> Glad we agree that safe abortion should continue to be available.

In those specific instances, yes. We agree.

−11

iluvgivingblowjobs t1_janp23h wrote

Of course, because if safe abortion was not legal then a lot of accidental murder would occur. Now we don’t want hundreds of dead women and deformed fetuses at birth, don’t we?

Like I said, so glad that we agree.

3

Lance_lake t1_janpq56 wrote

I think you are trying to be sly and make a point without saying it. Are you being sarcastic? Because yes. We both agree here.

−2

iluvgivingblowjobs t1_jasgu7t wrote

Good, it’s always nice to meet another pro-choice person. What you agreed to is exactly why we need safe and legal abortion, therefore making you pro-choice. Take care, I’m glad we had this chat.

2

Lance_lake t1_jasqrur wrote

> Good, it’s always nice to meet another pro-choice person. What you agreed to is exactly why we need safe and legal abortion, therefore making you pro-choice. Take care, I’m glad we had this chat. I'm fine with that as long as they are reserved to 3 things.

  1. The child will have no ability to live outside of the mother.

  2. The child is a product of rape.

  3. The child is a product of incest.

1

nalgene_wilder t1_jan4his wrote

Taking a pro-violence stance against unborn babies? A new low for the moral majority

7

Lance_lake t1_janai00 wrote

> Taking a pro-violence stance against unborn babies? A new low for the moral majority

I'm not speaking for a group. Simply myself. If you want to twist my words around like that, please feel free.

−1

Atrocious_1 t1_jao5vgy wrote

So killing conservatives is justifiable. Thank you for this clarification.

3

Lance_lake t1_jaoevko wrote

> So killing conservatives is justifiable. Thank you for this clarification.

No problem. It's as justifiable as killing liberals. Not at all. But you already knew that.

−1

Atrocious_1 t1_jaoku8e wrote

Liberals don't want to kill me though

3

Lance_lake t1_jaol8iu wrote

> Liberals don't want to kill me though

I fear with 1% of my being that they do though. So it's justifiable. :)

−1

iluvgivingblowjobs t1_jashhzf wrote

Thank you for again confirming that you’re pro-choice.

1

Lance_lake t1_jasqero wrote

I am very pro choice.

  1. Motherhood

  2. Abstance

  3. Adoption

I just don't believe in the 4th choice of killing a baby.

1