Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

jmdunkle t1_jahnu48 wrote

Not sure the equipment that detected it is affected by the scenario you laid out there

−21

AgentInCommand t1_jaho2gy wrote

The positive test threshold is so low that it's within the margin of error. You're basically getting a result that says 1, +/-1; you can call that a false positive, if you want to be charitable to the group that is making a spectacle of fentanyl at every opportunity, but it sure seems to border on malicious to me.

16

Karrius12 t1_jahqxur wrote

It absolutely is. Analytical chemistry often requires a trained analyst to be able to correctly interpret results - even then, often the best you can get is "This is consistent with X... but could also by Y or Z or a ton of other things."

12