Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_jais5hg wrote

Reply to comment by buzznbeez in Community members address 'After School Satan Club' at Saucon Valley school board meeting by Wuz314159

[deleted]

8

Advanced-Guard-4468 t1_jaj9duv wrote

Then they weren't Christians. They may be church goers but don't follow the teachings of Christ.

0

[deleted] t1_jajb666 wrote

[deleted]

3

Advanced-Guard-4468 t1_jajbbm6 wrote

I bet you have

−3

[deleted] t1_jajcx6q wrote

[deleted]

2

Advanced-Guard-4468 t1_jajfdpd wrote

They may not have been in your presence at the time. It doesn't mean you haven't met any.

−1

[deleted] t1_jajhiet wrote

[deleted]

4

Advanced-Guard-4468 t1_jajicco wrote

See, there's your mistake. You are looking for an organization and not an individual. You said you haven't met any Christians, then you look for an organization.

2

[deleted] t1_jajj8rm wrote

[deleted]

4

Advanced-Guard-4468 t1_jajm1vu wrote

I didn't get offended. You said you've never met a Christian that follows the teachings of Christ and I said I bet you have.

2

[deleted] t1_jajn2f8 wrote

[deleted]

5

Advanced-Guard-4468 t1_jajrejo wrote

I like to think I do but I'm human and make mistakes.

1

[deleted] t1_jajx962 wrote

[deleted]

3

Advanced-Guard-4468 t1_jajxowj wrote

Not sure how I jumped on you but whatever.

Its not my place to condemn others. She's not a Christian if she's calling others evil, she's just not a nice person insulting someone she doesn't know. She doesn't know what's in their heart.

But we weren't talking about her. We were talking about if you've ever met a Christian or not.

You see, you got me to pass judgment against that woman, I have no right in doing so. Being a Christian is not an easy path but worth it.

0

[deleted] t1_jak5e68 wrote

[deleted]

2

Advanced-Guard-4468 t1_jak6p47 wrote

Whine? No.

Have I stopped people from abuse in real life from abuse. I have and even at the risk of my own life. We are just having a discussion on an open forum.

0

AmpersandJovial t1_jak27ua wrote

"No True Scotsman, or appeal to purity, is an informal fallacy in which one attempts to protect their universal generalization from a falsifying counterexample by excluding the counterexample improperly."

Person A: "No Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge."
Person B: "But my uncle Angus is a Scotsman and he puts sugar on his porridge."
Person A: "But no true Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman

3