Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_j8iive9 wrote

Yeah, no. If you don’t know what a AR bullet does after it hits, you’re a clueless person. Which I already knew.

−1

Biggie313 t1_j8ik1v8 wrote

standard 55 gr .223 kinetic energy = ~1300 ft/lb.

standard 12 ga slug ~3000 ft/lb

You watch too many CNN reporters get PTSD from shooting a 22 caliber (.223) rifle.

Do you think 9mm will literally blow the lungs out of someone's body?

5

Geo_btw t1_j8ikdcy wrote

thank you for this. idk what that guys problem is. wait until he learns how powerful a bolt action 30-06 is!

6

[deleted] t1_j8ikysc wrote

So you don’t know what a small faster moving bullet does when it enters?

Being a dumb con doesn’t mean you get to be dumb with guns.

4

Biggie313 t1_j8il8jb wrote

Sure I do, I've shot animals with both .223, 12ga slug, and several other rounds. .223 is far weaker than nearly every other rifle / shotgun caliber.

Have you ever actually been hunting?

2

[deleted] t1_j8ilctp wrote

And it doesn’t tumble inside and destroy the meat..because a small faster bullet does exactly that.

Clueless guy

7

Biggie313 t1_j8imavp wrote

No it doesn't. If it hits bone it will fragment, or else it will just blow tl right through. But a slower expanding hollow / soft point will make a bigger wound.

Why do you keep trying to insult me?

5

[deleted] t1_j8imnqf wrote

6

Biggie313 t1_j8in4f8 wrote

Not wasting any more time on this. You obviously have no real life experience.

3

[deleted] t1_j8in7pk wrote

I posted a Doctor showing your take to be absolutely dumb, so now you have to run. Huh

4

Biggie313 t1_j8inl81 wrote

One article. It's a fact lots of other common hunting rifles have more energy and do more "damage" than .223. You just dont want to believe anything other than how scary the "AR15" is...

But also, hunting with semi auto's isn't just about AR-15's. You can hunting with a bolt action .308 now, but not a semi auto AR-10...

6

[deleted] t1_j8insa5 wrote

Again, just ignoring it and saying the same false talking points. Go back to Newsmax. Huh

5