Or0b0ur0s t1_j7pnl9i wrote on February 8, 2023 at 2:58 PM

Reply to comment by hsavvy in Landmark Pa. school funding case decided: The state’s system is unconstitutional by Hashslingingslashar

Yes, but you have to consider the source. This is part of the same organization that has strongly hinted though their stacked SCOTUS that things like non-white, non-landowning people and women probably shouldn't vote, since it wasn't "original" to the U.S. Constitution.

They're fascist plutocrats who will justify literally anything to put their hands deeper in your pockets or strengthen their power over you. If they told me the sky was blue and I was to get free tacos for life, I'd wonder what they were hiding up there and assume the tacos were poisoned so they could sell me the antidote.

hsavvy t1_j7psrgj wrote on February 8, 2023 at 3:34 PM

I worked against them in the House for 5 years so I am painfully aware of their bullshit.

veovis523 t1_j7x7ovo wrote on February 10, 2023 at 1:10 AM

Suffrage for non-whites and women was made part of the Constitution through the amendment process. The Supreme Court can't touch it, the only way to get rid of it would be to pass new amendments or completely get rid of the constitution.

Or0b0ur0s t1_j7xrxor wrote on February 10, 2023 at 3:48 AM

Unfortunately, those are both things the Republican Party has discussed doing since 2016. Fortunately, they don't seem to have the seats at any level needed to consider it since 2022.

What I was getting at is that they'll lie and bend any principle to grab more naked power. There's nothing you can point to and say "they won't do that" or "that goes against their platform / ideology", or even "that's nonsense / contradictory / hypocritical, because if it gets them more power, they absolutely will find a way to justify it.