This city detests people who aren't in a carGhostOfRobertTreat t1_jebx4mz wrote
Reply to comment by NewNewark in This city detests people who aren't in a car by NewNewark
So that is a good point that I hadn’t considered. Apologies. Obviously I did not mean that blind people are idiots.
What is the general practice in that case for when it’s not considered a good idea to remove a lane of traffic to accommodate? In some places you narrow a lane but this would be taking a two lane thoroughfare down to one and probably cause other issues.
NewNewark OP t1_jebz05w wrote
So you acknowledge that the choice was made between maintaining a car lane or providing a safe and accessible path for pedestrians. In other words, the title of this thread.
A travel lane, by the way, that is almost always filled with parked cars with their hazards on, making it not much of a lane at all.
If extremely crowded Manhattan can find the space to always provide a walkway, than so can Newark.
Regardless, the burden of how the accommodation is provided should fall on the construction people.
Heres another example in NYC with two simultaneous projects
One side of the street they build an in-road walkway
https://goo.gl/maps/iqJRCwpifbBUwLFY9
So presumably the folks across the street who started their construction later had to create a pedestrian tunnel since they couldnt use another lane
https://goo.gl/maps/EzHQQ62uBuD8obB76
https://goo.gl/maps/EAA5Pzp6g2NbRaAx5
infomanus t1_jecfnru wrote
Please the city bike lanes and bus lanes are filed with Amazon trucks offloading and sorting.
Designated lanes mean squat
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments