Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

thatguyrenic OP t1_ix52kj0 wrote

The idea here was to fit the functionality of an entire 108 into something much smaller (and ortho)...

1

v81 t1_ix53nid wrote

Why not go up to F16?

Also would you consider modifying it to use readily available key sets ? The 1.25 U keys on the edges are going to be a challenge to source.

3

thatguyrenic OP t1_ix54fnx wrote

I had issues with getting upper F keys to function properly when using them on a custom board before. had planned on those four being media keys like a 108. I would be building this and using an opensource firmware, so the keys would all be re-programmable anyways.

As far as the edge keys being hard to source at 1.25 for anything other than row 1: thanks. hadn't thought of that yet.

5

darknessblades t1_ix5enoh wrote

are you gonna make the keys angled [alice layout], or is it like the current layout

1

FairwayFinderGolf t1_ix5nv55 wrote

I honestly like it. I think the Ortholinear setup is nice. Also the customizable macro keys at the top would be a great addition as well. Honestly would love this

2

v81 t1_ix60lga wrote

Upper F keys aren't well supported in some applications, having 4 media keys might actually work nicely.

Something about this design had my interest... I'd love to see you follow it through.

2

readyplayeraon t1_ix62m1d wrote

I like the idea of a nav cluster in the middle (I've been playing around with that myself with a macro pad between the halves of my splits), but I agree with another commenter about BNM being wonky. I love "left" and "right" as layer names; I wish I had thought of that! It makes a lot more sense than "raise" and "lower" if you've got the MO switches on separate sides like most builds seem to.

2

NoOne-NBA- t1_ix6cdz5 wrote

I designed my layout specifically for me, for use in my work environment.

It is designed to be as efficient as possible in that environment.
Minimum hand movements were the primary goal, and keeping everything as true to a standard staggered board as possible was the secondary goal.
I wanted to minimize the amount of movement necessary, while maintaining my 40+ years of muscle memory.

With the layers I have, I can switch between the right hand alphas, arrow keys (on IJKL, with nav cluster keys surrounding those arrows), and numpad, on the fly, without moving my hands from the home position.

1

free2game t1_ix6fzmr wrote

You guys ever had to actually use CTRL+ALT+DEL?

1

thatguyrenic OP t1_ix6jt17 wrote

yup :)
I don't see how it would be hard to hit ctrl+alt+delete ... it would still be ctrl+alt+delete if on right layer, and would become ctrl+alt+layer+delete if on left layer - (if four buttons is too many for you, you could press that toggle button first)

1

gwenbeth t1_ix7ed52 wrote

Looks like you will be giving your pinkies a workout with the layers. If it was me, I'd lose the f keys and add a number row (but also it's not me, you do you)

2

jak0lantash t1_ix7xesq wrote

I really struggled with not having the \| left of the Z key, so I settled for moving that row 1U right (V is under G). I can understand how that feel horrible to others, but I found it the best compromise for me. My left 2U is space and right 2U is enter.

1

NoOne-NBA- t1_ix8g7y4 wrote

An alternate solution to that would have been to use a Mod Tap command on your left Shift key.
That would let it do Shift when held, and \| when tapped.

The only downside I see to that solution is it would require you to hold the Right Shift key, while hitting the Left Shift key, to type the | character.
That should seem at least relatively natural though, assuming you don't use Left Shift to type your shifted characters on the left side of your board.

1

tertius_decimus t1_ix8m97m wrote

On the fence regarding centric position for arrows. Not gonna be pretty ergo.

3