Submitted by The_Akkik t3_121omrr in MechanicalKeyboards
gangaskan t1_jdmqptw wrote
Cause I'm a net admin, 100% or bust.
But I am a different case I guess. I refuse to buy a separate numb pas I'd I don't have too.
jk_pens t1_jdn4sws wrote
I don't know why this personal opinion was getting downvoted. It's not like u/gangaskan was pooping on other sizes. Take my upvote.
HadouKang t1_jdn8rmg wrote
The part that rubs me the wrong way is how the preference is qualified by the job (net admin). Truth is, there'll be other net admins out there who prefer smaller layouts. Even within the same job function, there's going to be a spectrum of preference.
gangaskan t1_jdo09kq wrote
People are just jaded and strongly opinionated to the point where it's hurtful to them if you don't agree with them.
To each their own, I guess.
I even have a full size that has a trackball on the side. Too big for me lol.
AmnesiacTortoise t1_jdn7nop wrote
Upvoted for 100% as well, it may not be as stylish but for me at least: size does matter.
[deleted] t1_jdmugws wrote
[deleted]
NOCHNOY_ t1_jdn3hmh wrote
layering is inconvenient compared to a readily accessible numpad right on the side. shedding percentage is mostly for aesthetic reasons. you either need two hands, or have to be holding down a layer trigger key.
jk_pens t1_jdn4gxz wrote
>shedding percentage is mostly for aesthetic reasons
It's more than that. If you are right handed, losing the numpad and nav cluster allows your mouse to be closer to your right hand, which improves efficiency and ergonomics. Also, some of us have absolutely tiny desks and need to optimize for space. Since I rarely use F keys and never have need for a numpad, a 65% is exactly the right size for me for practical reasons.
NOCHNOY_ t1_jdn5d7q wrote
right.. efficiency. that's why the most successful people use 65% keyboards... no wait. they don't. 65 percenters are a tiny, tiny minority of keyboard users. it's not even worth mentioning the number compared to the gen pub.
but good for you.
HadouKang t1_jdn9na0 wrote
What correlation is there between being "successful" and layout size? I'd guess that most jobs only need the bare minimum keyboard that works. Everything past that is mostly preference.
NOCHNOY_ t1_jdq0z7u wrote
the word 'efficiency' was mentioned. successful people focus heavily on efficiency and streamlining. i don't see how that tiny, tiny change in desk space and "improved ergonomics" somehow makes you a better worker in the grand scheme of things. because if it did, corporations and companies would be the first to implement that system into their workspace. it doesn't happen. but if it makes you feel that it does, then good on you.
i've been in this hobby for a while, and people seem to have such a hard time admitting that a lot of this hobby revolves around pretentiousness and aesthetics. nothing wrong with it, but they try to push this narrative that it's somehow "better" and then go on to buy a numpad keyboard on the side. if your workflow doesn't rely on using numpads, then good for you.
stonewow1 t1_jdn43ps wrote
Instead of moving your hand, you hold a key. That's a good trade imo. It's up to you which is better
NOCHNOY_ t1_jdn4xew wrote
imo having your thumb pinned down to type is such a constricting and uncomfortable feeling. i want my hands to be floating free while i jot down numbers. i don't want to be pressing down a layer key every time i input numbers. it's liberating to type on a numpad compared to a layered numpad.
gangaskan t1_jdmvnog wrote
Meh, I still like my 100% just used to it.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments