Submitted by EmeraldMoose12 t3_116lwo4 in Maine
JimBones31 t1_j98m7en wrote
Reply to comment by moxie-maniac in What’s up with Bangor? by EmeraldMoose12
Portland does draw from all directions, something Bangor struggles with.
Portland isn't the best port for trade but it is significantly better than Bangor.
Edit: I would absolutely love if Portland got a good size container terminal.
solo-ran t1_j99i2cn wrote
I went to a conference as a rep for a congresswoman years ago. Here’s what I remember: the trajectory for trains heading west - avoiding hills - makes a big difference in shipping. Halifax NS, Norfolk VA, and NYC-NJ are the three best natural east coast sites for depth and have the best paths west. NYC is the absolute best but the real estate on shore is too expensive plus labor… so Norfolk and Halifax were battling it out. This was about accommodating a new wave of huge ships… and Portland wasn’t close. There also were surprisingly few permanent jobs given the vast amount of activity. This information is 25 years old… but at the time that was the consensus.
JimBones31 t1_j99jg6v wrote
That's really awesome insight. All of it accurate and lines up with my experience out here. I currently work in NYC on a tugboat and from all my history classes and shipping classes they all said that if Halifax had been focused on before NYC then it would have been what NYC is today.
I however, have much lower ambitions for a Portland container terminal. I wouldn't even aim for competing for ultra large carriers. I'd be happy to just take some trucks off the road and focus on domestic trade or even take some smaller ships coming from Halifax.
Cutlasss t1_j9agogd wrote
Halifax would not have beat our New York in the long run. Halifax is one of the great natural harbors of the world. But New York has an overwhelming advantage. The Erie Canal. Because there is only a couple of places in the Appalachians that has good access to the Ohio Valley. And that gave New York a more than 50 year head start on any port that required railroads to get to the interior.
DrGordonFreemanScD t1_j9awm3n wrote
The economic decline of upstate NY along the Erie Canal testifies as to the boom & bust nature of everything.
Cutlasss t1_j9b42a9 wrote
Sure. Everything is subject to change. But the direction of change now is really in the direction of large cities with a lot of services and higher education. All of rural America is feeling it.
DrGordonFreemanScD t1_j9f6f0d wrote
They've been feeling that for a long time now. That is pretty much the way things are going around the planet. Rural areas are dying out, as opportunities (for everything, sex, work, leisure) abound in larger population centers. That hasn't changed in decades. However, as the population ages, more old city folks are moving out of the cities. This is creating its' own set of problems. I don't see many ways in which this will change, but we humans are always lacking some amount of foresight.
Cutlasss t1_j9h7ewi wrote
Well, a problem with that is that rural areas are increasingly unable to provide the medical services that older people need.
DrGordonFreemanScD t1_j9jnirp wrote
One of the many
JimBones31 t1_j9ahc3y wrote
That's a good point!
rofopp t1_j9adij4 wrote
It has one. Eimskip
JimBones31 t1_j9ae41y wrote
This is news to me. You've pointed me in the right direction.
Hopefully we can continue to increase maritime trade in such a historic port. We see little ships like the one in that article come into NYC all the time.
Candygramformrmongo t1_j98pswh wrote
Same here but not likely to expand too much beyond what they have now. We’ll what the new cold storage facility has for an effect.
JimBones31 t1_j98tbvh wrote
Maybe our efforts to be environmentally conscious will lead to the Port of Portland's expansion. Interstate trucking doesn't come close to domestic shipping when it comes to efficiency.
Candygramformrmongo t1_j98v0vg wrote
It should, but that’s not the way Portland perceives it from my experience. They don’t want more trucks in town and are already looking at emissions from ships due to bunker fuel being dirtier. Maybe with the railhead? Basically, they don’t want the commercial on Commercial Street.
JimBones31 t1_j98vg9i wrote
It's a damn shame, that attitude hurts the future of the state economy.
The bunker fuel argument doesn't hold water (🤣) because those ships remove far more emissions from the roadways. Though it sounds like you're the type of person that knows that. 😁
ptmtp26 t1_j98yzrm wrote
Bars and clubs are commercial spaces. That’s all they need to survive, right?
Candygramformrmongo t1_j9bo867 wrote
Don’t forget hotels. Downtown is for the out of towners.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments