Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Calm_Captain_3541 t1_j192u0u wrote

Burning locally sourced logs or pellets is actually carbon negative bub. When a hot fire is burning it’s one of the most efficient sources of heat and releases so much less CO2 and methane than that same wood would have if left to rot in the forest.

11

thatsthatdude2u t1_j1aoh7o wrote

No bub, you're cherry picking rosy analysis and derp into confirmation bias. You're welcome.

0

thatsthatdude2u t1_j19hswt wrote

It's amazing the stories we tell ourselves so we believe what we're doing is the right thing even when it's not. Vermont has some of the dirtiest air in the country in the winter because of all the wood burning. It's not healthy it's not sustainable no matter how much you try to convince yourself it is.

−11

kmkmrod t1_j19l0mq wrote

9

Suspicious-Relief-31 t1_j1abhl9 wrote

Vermont, is a state ! Not a city, soooo much for creditably.

0

kmkmrod t1_j1am6s6 wrote

Yep, wood stoves can release particulates. And natural gas burners can release carbon monoxide. What’s your point?

2