feina635 t1_ixx9bw6 wrote
RSV is an incredibly common virus. Most people have had it in their lifetime. The only reason it’s blown up the way it has is bc of the staggered effect of kids not being exposed to this common virus for like 2 years.
Masking was absolutely necessary during peak covid. However one of the backend issues from all that protection is kids are only now getting exposed, which means a confluence of a LOT of sickness, hitting kids’ immune systems which are weaker (to this virus), and a shitstorm of hospitalizations.
Adults should be fine if you get it. It’s a bad cold
joeydokes OP t1_ixxdgoq wrote
Heya, thanks for the reply and information. As someone old who's been informed on flu and pneumonia I'm surprised to first learn of it now; and not even last winter, despite my recent arrival from VT.
I grok ya on kids, on the flip side of protection causing different issues and their immune systems AOT adults. Since RSV can be passed easily between adults and kids, behavior of both are affected.
With the reality being 'what it is', would you agree that masking up (indoors) during peak winter is necessary? So far, the consensus is no. I was thinking that could change sooner than later. Are you saying NBD?
feina635 t1_ixyjvlk wrote
It’s really personal preference at this point. Masking will definitely help stay more protected, but eventually you or your kid(s) will get RSV. Again, the reason this is a “surge” and all over the news isn’t bc RSV is a big deal (normally) it’s bc of confluence of events and all the hospitals blowing up with admissions all at once. O don’t think the majority of people will return to masking nor do I think masking requirements should return. But if individuals want to continue to do so, that’s perfectly acceptable.
joeydokes OP t1_iy093ha wrote
> but eventually you or your kid(s) will get RSV.
Word.
And your pointing out the burden of this confluence of events (this winter) was my reason for posting. Ascertaining if people are willing to mask up (indoors) to reduce the expected stress on the health-care system.
ecco-domenica t1_ixyucy0 wrote
The reason it's blowing up is that widespread and repeated covid infections have damaged people's immune systems so they're more likely to get RSV and flu, making it more likely they get passed around to vulnerable people like children and elderly.
feina635 t1_ixz1l82 wrote
I suppose that’s a theory, but it’s not proven. Lack of prolonged lack of exposure to common viruses that’s normally have been well tolerated has certainly impacted the severity and intensity of cases
ecco-domenica t1_ixzx4vp wrote
That is also a theory that has been debunked. Just so you know. There's no such thing as an immunity gap.
Frankdrebbinnotacop t1_ixz0vt4 wrote
Yes, thank you for saying this.
We've all known for some time that covid causes damage to the immune system, yet some feel the need to craft ludicrous explanations for unprecedented illness among young people (who experienced massive exposure to covid).
The immune system "gap" discourse is absolute nonsense anyway. Those types of population level changes take generations, not say-- 2.5 years.
feina635 t1_ixzilpw wrote
Just curious where you're pulling your info from? My SO is an a Pediatric ICU doctor, who has been and is currently in the thick of everything. Literally THE person taking care of all the RSV/covid cases. So I'm just interested to know where you heard that the Immune system gap is "ludicrous" and specifically how covid causes long term damage to the immune system?
jarnhestur t1_iy3isab wrote
Wrong. There’s zero science that says everyone who gets COVID has a damaged immune system.
In fact, the more germs you are exposed to, the stronger your immune system tends to be. People who wore stayed home, didn’t interact with others in person, and were hyper conscious about germs are going to struggle to fight off this winters standard bugs.
ecco-domenica t1_iy6gm8a wrote
Nope. It's the opposite with covid. The more covid re-infections you get, even "mild" ones, the worse it tends to be for your immune system, tending to make you more vulnerable to other viruses as well as to more covid re-infections, and to long covid damage to your cardiac system, your brain, and your respiratory system. It's possible it can even re-activate viruses you've had previously, and as you say, RSV is an incredibly common virus.
Repeated covid infections are not equivalent to kids getting beneficial exposure to antigens by playing in the dirt, or coming home with a little runny nose from daycare every so often, or overcoming allergies by gradual repeated exposure.
It's starting to sink in, with those who are paying attention, that covid takes a cumulative toll on all systems of the body including immune response. Apply these effects across the huge population of people who've already had at least one infection, add in our inadequate vaccination/booster numbers and antipathy to mitigation, and you've got problems.
Look, I'm not here to argue about it or try to convince you or anyone else. It's complicated. Wait and see. Then, some day, remember what I said. But here's one summary of some current findings including several on immunological effects. I hesitate to post it because URLs generally just get ignored or cause more arguments but what the heck.
https://jessicawildfire.substack.com/p/you-may-be-early-but-youre-not-wrong
https://thetyee.ca/Analysis/2022/11/07/COVID-Reinfections-And-Immunity/
*I never said EVERYONE. You threw that in.
jarnhestur t1_iy86twn wrote
There's not a single scientific study showing that the majority of people who get COVID and recover have long term damage to their immune system. It's outright fear mongering from people who need to cling to something to dwell on.
Frankly, the mental health issues stemming from this fear mongering *at this point* are worse than getting COVID. Be happy, live your life, and stop the handwringing.
ecco-domenica t1_iyce0ao wrote
So as I predicted, you ignored the URLs which consisted of lists, summaries and analysis of recent and ongoing studies. Which you demanded I produce. All of which are published in reputable scientific journals. OK. My mental health is fine. But then, I'm not living in denial. You seem oddly triggered that an internet stranger is suggesting that all is not hunky dory if you're really so confident that it is. Wait and see. Just remember I told you.
jarnhestur t1_iycoiaj wrote
No, I read them - they are essentially arguing that there is no herd immunity, which also is an argument against the effectiveness of the vaccines. They also confirm what I said - the majority of people who get COVID recover just fine.
Again, your focusing on the uncommon cases, and potential ‘what if’s’, and things we don’t understand, and drawing conclusions off that.
joeydokes OP t1_iyb3ydj wrote
> People who wore [masks or] stayed home, didn’t interact with others in person, and were hyper conscious about germs are going to struggle to fight off this winters standard bugs.
No we're not, because we're still masking up (in public), still social distancing and still being vax'd . People doing none of the above are more likely to get infected; whether its a mild case or otherwise.
Your assertion that exposure makes our bodies more resilient is not untrue. That said, antibody resistance to CV19 will be different than resistance to RSV; or to flu virii, or herpes or any of the litany of other viruses (AOT bacterial) floating around out there.
I guess my assertion is improved resistance to germ A does not imply greater resistance to germ B. And, we're just talking respiratory virii here. And, FWIW, despite repeat exposure to germ A producing improved resistance down the road, you are not the same person down the road; you get older, weaker, .... you change (along w/your immunology).
What you're suggesting is akin to saying hey, I got malaria in SA, but skip the preventions, if I get hit again it won't be so bad. Except it is, and depending on the env, availability of medicine,.... could be much worse.
jarnhestur t1_iycoueg wrote
No. I’m saying that interacting with the word builds your immune system better than isolation. I think that isolation and being fearful leads to unhealthy mental state.
DidDunMegasploded t1_iy0dxp2 wrote
Ah shit...here we go again. The "iT's JuSt A cOlD!!!!!11" Darwin denial anti-vaxxers love to spew out.
I didn't think it would rear its ugly head in 2022, but here we are...
joeydokes OP t1_ixxfra0 wrote
I was wondering about envelopes, antibodies, and genomes (oh my) to understand differences/similarities so decided to dive deeper and do a netsearch on the issue and came across what you refer to, i think:
feina635 t1_ixykc9s wrote
Yea that’s a good summary
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments