Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

IamSauerKraut t1_ivrkdq1 wrote

Reply to comment by IoTPanic in Does anyone actually like the political signs? by IoTPanic

Ironic you complain I did not read everything you want me to read but you have no issue with you not reading what I wrote.

−6

IoTPanic OP t1_ivrlpbu wrote

Trust me I read every one, and it's ICONIC rather than ironic you want to be a leader, yet you'd rather litter our beautiful state by supporting your signage in public spaces, rather than reaching out to the communities in more productive ways.

0

IamSauerKraut t1_ivrm7ae wrote

You do not like yard signs. That much is clear.

But if I do not respond directly to your post, why are you up my arse? My response was to another poster, not to you. So take your anger and your desire to control what I do and shove it up your immature little hiney hole.

4

IoTPanic OP t1_ivrn7bx wrote

Frankly the yard signs existing is not my problem, you still fail to understand the thread, and you being salty about my reply after just explaining to someone it's your first amendment right to litter our public space is the reason I am up you.

You are the problem, and I need you to understand that.

EDIT: added "our public space", ruin your own yard, as made clear in the post.

−4

IamSauerKraut t1_ivrrxc7 wrote

I need not understand the entirety of the thread; indeed, I need not even read the entire thread to respond to one specific comment as I did.

Further the exercise of a person's first amendment right in public spaces is not littering, despite your unclever effort to make it so. Your unwillingness to understand that is the problem.

2

IoTPanic OP t1_ivrt1vz wrote

Wow, I'm not sure any defense is needed after you make a reply like that. Enjoy your day sir 😆👍

1

IamSauerKraut t1_ivs10hp wrote

>You are the problem, and I need you to understand that.

Your self-centered attitude is the problem; you need to understand that.

1