Comments
Empath5791 t1_ixdvbkn wrote
There are plenty of guns up there. Mostly hunting rifles, but still.
Empath5791 t1_ixdvjo9 wrote
(from there, not trying to generalize about people from that area)
WalkerBRiley t1_ixdxgeb wrote
So what you're telling us is you actually need even more guns, because apparently there weren't enough to prevent this from happening.
Empath5791 t1_ixdy3p1 wrote
Right. I suppose it takes endless guns by a gun lovers logic. If the amount of guns up there didn’t stop it then I guess it takes an unfathomable amount of guns, right?
Super-Lychee8852 t1_ixfiy6z wrote
If a man wants to hurt another man he's going to do it with whatever tool he can. Had this been a stabbing would you make the same comment?
Guygan t1_ixfl29x wrote
Yes. If everyone in Maine had 3 guns at all times, no one would ever get shot.
/s
Guygan t1_ixfl4t8 wrote
Stabbing is a lot harder to do than pulling a trigger, sport.
Super-Lychee8852 t1_ixfok0q wrote
Against an unsuspecting victim? Pretty easy
Guygan t1_ixfp2el wrote
> Had this been a stabbing
Weird how there are many times more knives in the US, yet it's guns that are used for most murders and mass shootings.
Your "argument" is stupid.
Super-Lychee8852 t1_ixfrq3e wrote
Depends how you view the statistics. If you're not in a gang or involved drug use. You are more likely to be stabbed or killed a blunt weapon then shot
DreddPirateJonesy t1_ixh9g63 wrote
Endemic in the US, such a polarizing debate and yet so obvious that having weapons of death so freely available to the whole populous leads to more death
Doc_coletti t1_ixhhdz3 wrote
Gotta fight fire with fire I guess
Guygan t1_ixdfyj2 wrote
Surely more guns will prevent this from happening, right guys?