Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Oniriggers t1_je77j5k wrote

I’m heading to Florida soon, my first outside New England trip since covid. I’m only going because it was a free trip basically, I wouldn’t pay good money to go on my own…

11

derpmcperpenstein t1_je7g32q wrote

Also thankful to live here. I have friends in Cali. Sounds like an entire different country to me.

6

GuppyGB t1_je7pfik wrote

I thought this was going to be about people's interpretation of how tight and loose objects are, like pickle jar lids and lug nuts.

11

rdstrmfblynch79 t1_je85sf8 wrote

Hillary and biden "carrying" all the loose states seems incredibly disingenuous when maine actually contributed electoral college votes to trump. Wonder if the author even knows about maine's non-all for 1 system....

I wonder what the north's looseness rating is though because some of the stuff like natural disasters and resources entirely buck the trend of being tight

Also I'm pretty surprised (and almost skeptical) about the dakotas. Plenty of natural resources, didn't think they were susceptible to disaster or environmental stuff not at all densely populated. Are they fat as fuck and dying early or something?

2

Tacticalaxel t1_jeas9wp wrote

Been there recently. Broken cars and tire carcass everywhere, soulless suburbs, concrete, strip malls, and chain restaurants. Disney is the most genuine place in the state. And that's not mentioning the government.

9

ButtStuff-69 t1_jecdkh9 wrote

From the linked study in the article:

tightness (many strongly enforced rules and little tolerance for deviance)

versus

looseness (few strongly enforced rules and greater tolerance for deviance)

2

SavageNachoMan t1_jef9wuu wrote

So California is the loosest state? And yet one the scientist’s assertions is that loose states will exhibit: lower incidences of disease, lower mortality rates, lower population density and less homelessness?

That doesn’t seem to check out.

2