BKofCountedSorrows t1_jd5vxo2 wrote on March 22, 2023 at 1:25 AM

Reply to comment by [deleted] in Higher breakthrough rate lately with Covid in Maine? by BadLuckShoesie

Oh damn. ! In this sub..... ? ... Hope you are ready for what's to come. . . Best of Luck. Will you delete before the downvote count hits -50 ?

Edit: You are 100% correct. FWIW.

MosskeepForest t1_jd5wtzm wrote on March 22, 2023 at 1:31 AM

Looks like the mods banned me and then muted me so I can't even ask why. Apparently it's "go along with the liberals or be removed".

Congrats fascists.

pinetreesgreen t1_jd648pp wrote on March 22, 2023 at 2:28 AM

The study you cited on masks said the study was inconclusive bc the data was poor.

MosskeepForest t1_jd67491 wrote on March 22, 2023 at 2:51 AM

Looks like the mods banned me and then muted me so I can't even ask why. Apparently it's "go along with the liberals or be removed".

Congrats fascists.

pinetreesgreen t1_jd6975d wrote on March 22, 2023 at 3:08 AM

No, the study you cited was bad. As in the one you said reached the conclusion you thought supported your own. When it didn't.

MosskeepForest t1_jd69xyw wrote on March 22, 2023 at 3:14 AM

Looks like the mods banned me and then muted me so I can't even ask why. Apparently it's "go along with the liberals or be removed".

Congrats fascists.

pinetreesgreen t1_jd6bpzf wrote on March 22, 2023 at 3:30 AM

In the 76 studies they looked at that were not on covid? Okay. There were two studies on covid. Which they said were unreliable bc people were not using masks regularly. Just like the other data. It's your study. Read it. Under "author's conclusions".