Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_j9f1cgt wrote

Reply to comment by huehue12132 in [D] On papers forcing the use of GANs where it is not relevant by AlmightySnoo

[removed]

2

notdelet t1_j9g627c wrote

> Assuming Gaussianity and then using maximum likelihood gives yields an L2 error minimization problem.

Incorrect, only true if you fix the scale parameter. I normally wouldn't nitpick like this but your unnecessary usage of bold made me.

> (if you interpret training as maximum likelihood estimation)

> a squared loss does not "hide a Gaussian assumption".

It does... if you interpret training as (conditional) MLE. Give me a non-Gaussian distribution with an MLE estimator that yields MSE loss. Also, residuals are explicitly not orthogonal projections whenever the variables are dependent.

0

notdelet t1_j9gija3 wrote

In the future know that blocking someone after replying to them prevents them from responding to your reply. This means you are giving the false impression I am not responding to you (but can) to those who are not one of us.

1