Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Mefaso t1_j9dbyoz wrote

Reply to comment by Agreeable-Run-9152 in [D] On papers forcing the use of GANs where it is not relevant by AlmightySnoo

>However there is a small Chance they acted in good faith and did Not see that the randomness in the GAN wont do anything.

Why is the default assumption malice?

Especially if the only benefit would be a workshop paper

16

Agreeable-Run-9152 t1_j9dh1pu wrote

I would assume that someone who is capable of programming a GAN and go through all the steps of Parameter Tuning at some Point should realize that the randomness shouldnt do anything.

10