>IMO reviewers at these journals/conferences need to be more mindful of this kind of plagiarism/low-effort submission.

Workshops in general have a very low bar, this surely wouldn't have been published in the main track.

Other than that I don't really see the point of this rant.

Yes there are a lot of bad papers, there are a lot of bad papers even in the main tracks, you just kind of get used to it.

It feels a lot like hitting down a well. Maybe these are some undergraduates doing their first research project and it's more about learning the methodologies and writing rather than very novel approaches.