Submitted by MurlocXYZ t3_110swn2 in MachineLearning
berryaroberry t1_j8aveyl wrote
The following is my opinion; so bias is there. My feeling is the sub was never about academic discussions per se. The papers and academic discussions acted like vessels to carry people towards "(deep learning hype + money flow+ industry jobs)" island. In most of the earlier discussions ,if you follow them closely, you will see that there was never really a push for genuine understanding, rather people looking for easy way to earn "publication currency". Initial impression was having some kinda project or publication could land people a high-paying job. Probably later people realized that actually they don't need to worry about papers and stuff, rather doing some kinda quick LLM based project will help to land high-paying jobs even faster. I mean LLMs are currently at the peak of hype. Thus we have more random looking posts.
leondz t1_j8cc933 wrote
As an academic, the non-academic nature of the sub has always been one of its great advantages. I get enough academic research in the day job
impossiblefork t1_j8ewogm wrote
I talked research with researchers here, partially in PM, but some of it openly.
I'm sure many others did too. The current problem is something new and which has come during the past few days.
[deleted] t1_j95xti7 wrote
[deleted]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments