Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

pommedeterresautee OP t1_j7u0p8z wrote

Reply to comment by blackkettle in [P] Get 2x Faster Transcriptions with OpenAI Whisper Large on Kernl by pommedeterresautee

Using CG doesn't affect the output quality.

What works with Whisper will still work with CG+Whisper.

3

blackkettle t1_j7u2kd0 wrote

Probably my question was not well-formulated. I'm just curious about what the RTF vs Accuracy tradeoff looks like. I'm not questioning whether it works, I'm just curious what the actual performance looks like.

You report on memory usage and beam sizes, as well as relative speedup, but it would be interesting to also see WER performance, as well as the actual absolute RTFs.

2

whata_wonderful_day t1_j7ubutx wrote

His point is that it's identical. They didn't use quantization or anything that would hurt performance. The whisper paper has a lot of the details you're asking for

2

blackkettle t1_j7ud34i wrote

Are you talking about this paper:

- https://cdn.openai.com/papers/whisper.pdf

maybe I missed it but I can't find any place in that paper where they talk about the trade-offs with respect to real time factor and decoding strategies. RTF vs acc curves for CPU vs GPU for STT typically vary not in terms of absolute performance but in terms of where along the RTF curve you achieve a particular accuracy. That impacts what kinds of tasks you can expect to use the model for, and how you can expect to scale it to real world applications. So far this has been the weakest point for all the Whisper related work (still better off with espnet, k2, speechbrain, etc). This information would be interesting to see if they have it.

2