Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

sonofmath t1_j7p0ml4 wrote

Not up to date, but a solid basis is Spinning Up

26

mr_house7 t1_j7phbx1 wrote

Is this also kind of a course?

2

sonofmath t1_j7q03db wrote

Well.. kind of. Now for courses I would recommend Silver's course, followed by Levine's course, which are both available on youtube (besides reading the Sutton-Barto book). But besides the reading list, it also provides a detailed explaination of the most important model-free algorithms, as well as code implementations that are supposed to be as easy to understand as possible. Now if you want performent code for research/personal projects, I would not recommend SpinningUp, but it is a great way to learn how they are implemented.

4

mr_house7 t1_j7qpnc4 wrote

Thank you so much for your reply.

I did take a look at your suggestions. The Sergey Levine course seems really awesome, It is definitely on the list to do. But I'm a little bit conflicted regarding the David Silver course. I have a few follow-up questions, if you don't mind:

I'm currently doing Hugging Face Deep RL course. It is free and at the end I get a certification of completion, not that I care much about the certification, but it is always nice to get a certificate.

Also, isn't the David Silver course a little outdated? It seems that the video lectures were made 7 years ago. I guess the basics don't change, but I was wondering what is the best course to take. I think they are around the same lvl of difficulty. What would you choose?

5

sonofmath t1_j7se4mx wrote

Can't really speak for Hugging Face. It seems to touch on relatively advanced topics and challenging tasks. It certainly looks nice from a practitoner's side, which is very useful to learn the various tricks to make RL work.

Regarding Silver's course, it is a bit outdated indeed, but the focus is more on the basics of RL, whereas Levine focuses on deep RL and assumes a good understanding of the basics.

Now, there are some topics in Silver's course which are a bit outdated (e.g. TD(lambda) with eligibility traces or linear function approximation) which would be better replaced by other topics in more modern courses, typically DQN or AlphaGo (UCL has also a more recent series, which touches on Deep RL). But Silver's explainations are very instructive and is one of the best taught university courses I have seen (in general). I would for sure at least watch the first few lectures.

2

mr_house7 t1_j7uza9c wrote

I'm so sorry to bother you again. Just one final question.
Do you know if the Spinning up algos are worth while? Since I'm on Windows it seems to be a little more changeling to install it in my local machine. Is there an alternative to installing on local machine like colab?

1

sonofmath t1_j7vehdk wrote

Not really, I think the main strength of the library is that it is designed to be easy to understand how the algorithms are implemnted. At the time, the main alternative was OpenAI/Stable baselines, which was quite obscure to understand how the algorithms are implemented. On the other hand, the algorithms do not use some more advanced tricks that enhance performance

However, there are better libraries now. In the same spirit, there is CleanRL, that is clean (with algorithms in one file) , but also performent. If you are looking for a modular easy-to-use library, I would recommend Stable Baselines3

2

iron_proxy t1_j7pyvou wrote

I woukd start with kaggle's RL course. Its a good into and has links to david silver's lecture series and sutton and barto's text book. Both are excellent intoductions to rl theory

5

JuryOk5543 t1_j7oxtz8 wrote

That kind of depends where you're starting from. What level are you at now?

4

C_l3b OP t1_j7oy3z4 wrote

I took courses about Machine Learning and Deep Learning at uni.

3

fnbr t1_j7q9v1m wrote

Sutton and Barto is obligatory if you want to learn RL, imo. Even as an experienced researcher, I read it every year or so. It's very approachable.

3

C_l3b OP t1_j7qc0cr wrote

That looks really cool, thx

1

None_365 t1_j7oyr25 wrote

You should create a github repo first.

−5