Submitted by Wiskkey t3_10vg97m in MachineLearning
klop2031 t1_j7qcak1 wrote
Reply to comment by MisterBadger in [N] Getty Images sues AI art generator Stable Diffusion in the US for copyright infringement by Wiskkey
Take a gander here: https://youtu.be/G08hY8dSrUY At min 8 and 9 sec Seems like no one knows how scotus will deal with it but a good argument is that an AI is experiencing are like humans and generates new work by mixing in its skill.
Further, it seems like the law may only differentiate it by the intelligences' physical makeup.
And to be honest, it seems like the only ppl mad about generative networks producing art are the artists about to lose their jobs.
Who cares if an AI can create art, if one only cares about the creative aspect then the human can make art too, no one is stopping them. But really its about money.
MisterBadger t1_j7rj1bf wrote
Machine learning algorithms are not even "intelligent" enough to filter out Getty watermarks.
They do not have minds or experiences, any more than zbrush or cinema4D or any other complicated software do.
Furthermore, they do not produce outputs like humans do - the speed and scale are more akin to automated car factories than human tinkers.
Fair use laws were not designed with them in mind.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments