I get that he is annoyed that people believe ChatGPT is such a milestone breakthrough unique to OpenAI. It is not, since most big players already have or capable of having LLM tuned to similar capabilities. Yet from the InstructGPT paper, the way they label their data is nothing that any big players can't handle. I also get that he is pissed when people praise OpenAI for its "openness" — OpenAI is absolutely not a fan for the whole open source movement, though maybe reasonably so.

My question is why don't the big players give their bots similar exposure? I find it hard to believe that ethics and some internet critics to be the only reasons.