Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

vwvwvvwwvvvwvwwv t1_j6xgaqc wrote

I've had success with normalizing flows in problems where both directions of the transformation were important (although presumably an autoencoder might work just as well).

This was published yesterday: Flow Matching for Generative Modeling

TL;DR: We introduce a new simulation-free approach for training Continuous Normalizing Flows, generalizing the probability paths induced by simple diffusion processes. We obtain state-of-the-art on ImageNet in both NLL and FID among competing methods.

Abstract: We introduce a new paradigm for generative modeling built on Continuous Normalizing Flows (CNFs), allowing us to train CNFs at unprecedented scale. Specifically, we present the notion of Flow Matching (FM), a simulation-free approach for training CNFs based on regressing vector fields of fixed conditional probability paths. Flow Matching is compatible with a general family of Gaussian probability paths for transforming between noise and data samples---which subsumes existing diffusion paths as specific instances. Interestingly, we find that employing FM with diffusion paths results in a more robust and stable alternative for training diffusion models. Furthermore, Flow Matching opens the door to training CNFs with other, non-diffusion probability paths. An instance of particular interest is using Optimal Transport (OT) displacement interpolation to define the conditional probability paths. These paths are more efficient than diffusion paths, provide faster training and sampling, and result in better generalization. Training CNFs using Flow Matching on ImageNet leads to state-of-the-art performance in terms of both likelihood and sample quality, and allows fast and reliable sample generation using off-the-shelf numerical ODE solvers.

4