Submitted by mettle t3_10oyllu in MachineLearning
mettle OP t1_j6im95b wrote
Reply to comment by EmmyNoetherRing in [Discussion] ChatGPT and language understanding benchmarks by mettle
this is true so far, it would seem.
you'd think there'd be some clever folks trying to quantify things better.
EmmyNoetherRing t1_j6j7zq4 wrote
I wouldn’t mind being one of those folks. But you make a good point that the old rubrics may not be capturing it.
If you want to nail down what users are observing as its comparison to human performance, practically speaking you may need to shift to diagnostics that were designed to evaluate human performance. With the added challenge of avoiding tests where the answer sheet would already be in its training data.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments