Submitted by Valachio t3_10ack6h in MachineLearning
sabertoothedhedgehog t1_j465kq6 wrote
Reply to comment by rehrev in [D] Has ML become synonymous with AI? by Valachio
This is not correct.
These algorithms are definitely learning (i.e. improving performance at a task through experience, i.e. by observing more data).
Intelligence is hard to define. Something like 'efficiency at acquiring skills at a broad range of tasks' would be one definition. We're getting there. This is the weak vs strong AI hypothesis: can we merely simulate intelligence or are we creating actual intelligence.
[deleted] t1_j472mgw wrote
[removed]
sabertoothedhedgehog t1_j473src wrote
Why are you both condescending and factually wrong?
(a) They ARE learning.
(b) The learning definition I used is the one that defines ML according to Tom Mitchell. You thinking it was some kind of useless definition tells more about you.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments