Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

rehrev t1_j45znkx wrote

İts just jargon

İt's not intelligence and they are not learning.

−6

sabertoothedhedgehog t1_j465kq6 wrote

This is not correct.
These algorithms are definitely learning (i.e. improving performance at a task through experience, i.e. by observing more data).

Intelligence is hard to define. Something like 'efficiency at acquiring skills at a broad range of tasks' would be one definition. We're getting there. This is the weak vs strong AI hypothesis: can we merely simulate intelligence or are we creating actual intelligence.

2

[deleted] t1_j472mgw wrote

[removed]

−2

sabertoothedhedgehog t1_j473src wrote

Why are you both condescending and factually wrong?

(a) They ARE learning.
(b) The learning definition I used is the one that defines ML according to Tom Mitchell. You thinking it was some kind of useless definition tells more about you.

1

[deleted] t1_j474m07 wrote

[removed]

−2

[deleted] t1_j4751n4 wrote

[removed]

1

[deleted] t1_j481hcs wrote

[removed]

1