Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

erelim t1_j3x3pl1 wrote

Everyone is currently behind openAI even Google who likely considers this existential risk. If you were Google/MS would you rather buy and become the leader and their talent or let the competitor buy them, thinking you can build something from behind to overtake the leader. The latter is possible but riskier than the first

1

starstruckmon t1_j3x4bsr wrote

How is Google behind OpenAI? Chinchilla has simmilar performance as GPT3 yet is much cheaper to run since it has less than half the parameters.

2

visarga t1_j41avq0 wrote

Many smaller models give good results on classification and extractive tasks. But when they need to get creative they don't sound so great. I don't know if Chinchilla is as creative as the latest from OpenAI, but my gut feeling says it isn't.

1

starstruckmon t1_j41dgsk wrote

There's no way for us to tell for certain, but since Google has used it for creativity oriented projects/papers like Dramatron, I don't think so. I feel the researchers would have said something instead of leading the whole world intentionally astray as everyone is now following Chinchilla's scaling laws.

Chinchilla isn't just a smaller model. It's adequately trained unlike GPT3 which is severely undertrained, so simmilar, if not exceeding ( as officially claimed ), capabilities isn't unexpected.

1