Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

yldedly t1_j3dwdv6 wrote

Reply to comment by IntelArtiGen in [Discussion] Is there any alternative of deep learning ? by sidney_lumet

I agree of course, you can't compress more than some hard limit, even in lossy compression. I just think DL finds very poor compression schemes compared to what's possible (compare DL for that handwriting problem above to the solution constructed by human experts).

2

IntelArtiGen t1_j3dyhfy wrote

By default it's true that DL algorithms are truly unoptimized on this point because modelers usually don't really care about optimizing the number of parameters.

For example Resnet50 uses 23 million parameters, which is much more than efficient net B0 which uses 5 million parameters and have a better accuracy (and is harder to train). But when you try to further optimize algorithms which were already optimized on their number of parameters you quickly see these limits. You would need models that would be even more efficient than these DL models which are already optimized regarding their number of parameters.

A DL model could probably solve this handwriting problem with a very low number of parameters if you build it specifically with this goal in mind.

2