Submitted by Baturinsky t3_104u1ll in MachineLearning
Baturinsky OP t1_j3hnmdc wrote
Reply to comment by Blasket_Basket in [D] Is it a time to seriously regulate and restrict AI research? by Baturinsky
I'm no expert indeed, that's why I was asking.
But experts in the field also think that serious concerns on AI safety is justified
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Letter_on_Artificial_Intelligence
Also, a lot of good arguments here:
[deleted] t1_j40im8k wrote
[removed]
sneakpeekbot t1_j40imu3 wrote
Here's a sneak peek of /r/ControlProblem using the top posts of the year!
#1: I gave ChatGPT the 117 question, eight dimensional PolitiScales test | 48 comments
#2: Computers won't be intelligent for a million years – to build an AGI would require the combined and continuous efforts of mathematicians and mechanics for 1-10 million years. | 9 comments
#3: Ilya Sutskever, co-founder of OpenAI: "it may be that today's large neural networks are slightly conscious" | 43 comments
^^I'm ^^a ^^bot, ^^beep ^^boop ^^| ^^Downvote ^^to ^^remove ^^| ^^Contact ^^| ^^Info ^^| ^^Opt-out ^^| ^^GitHub
asingov t1_j40suvt wrote
Cherry picking Musk and Hawking out of a list which includes Norvig, Deepmind, Russel and "academics from Cambridge, Oxford, Stanford, Harvard and MIT" is just dishonest.
bob_shoeman t1_j40ukrr wrote
Alright, that’s fair - edited. I didn’t read through the first link properly.
Point remains that there is pretty generally a pretty complete lack of knowledge of what the field is like. r/ControlProblem most certainly is full of nonsense.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments