Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

kingwhocares t1_j1y3ac5 wrote

Reply to comment by starstruckmon in [P] Can you distinguish AI-generated content from real art or literature? I made a little test! by Dicitur

It's actually easier if you look at it with this in mind:

Paintings are done on some type of paper and over time both the paper and ink/paint/oil becomes old. For AI, it has to fake it and look for the faked effect. Original has things like lines and wrinkles.

3

starstruckmon t1_j1y6eon wrote

I dont think that method is fullproof, but yeah, if I took it again or gave each more time, Im sure I'd get better results. I think the ones I got most wrong are

  • Some of really bad smudgy stuff that was apparently done by humans.

  • Some of the really good ones that were done by Midjourney. Though I do think I can spot these much easier now. They're kind of uncannily good. Like a bit too photoreal while not actually being photoreal. The paper thing also seems to work on these ones.

3