Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Ulfgardleo t1_j1vd1op wrote

Reply to comment by KonArtist01 in [P] Can you distinguish AI-generated content from real art or literature? I made a little test! by Dicitur

there are definitely signs. paper texture is often wrong. hands are often wrong. With all my guesses of "old master" i was never really sure, but with the AI guesses i often were pretty confident.

3

KonArtist01 t1_j1vsr9l wrote

But it got to the point where there is no sure tell. If you encounter an AI painting in the wild, no one will give you the correct answer. And the important thing is that the signs you mentioned do not take anything away from the beauty that lies within.

3

Ulfgardleo t1_j1w3qhc wrote

I am not sure about you but I can predict a significant amount of ai paintings with high confidence. There are still significant errors in paper/material texture. Like "the model has not understood that canvas threads do not swirl". Or "this Hand looks off" or "this eye looks wrong".

(All three examples visible in the painting test above).

1